A Consumer Packaged Goods
Information Services (IS) Department was tasked with providing information
technology solutions to each of its partner holding companies. Due to outdated
project management methodologies and tools and multiple organizational restructuring
efforts, Project Managers struggled to deliver their solutions on time and
under budget.
IS Senior Directors had
limited visibility into resource allocation, project interdependencies, issues,
and risks. Additionally, neither processes nor infrastructure existed to
support large scale technical programs. The organization did not understand the
support it could expect from the PMO and, therefore, rarely leveraged it as a
resource. Due to inconsistent communication and guidance on documentation requirements,
Project Managers spent time on irrelevant and redundant tasks.
Further, the PMO had never
measured the value of its services or polled customers on their needs; thus, it
had no charter that articulated its mission or objectives. Lastly, there was minimal project management
experience within the PMO, and the staff was not cross-trained in the services
the PMO offered.
Solution:
CapTech conducted a thorough review and analysis of the
methodologies, processes, templates, and other tools supporting Project
Management at the client. Based on those findings, CapTech surveyed,
interviewed, and conducted focus groups with the PMO’s key customers and
stakeholders regarding the current services and value it offered. Lastly, Stakeholders were asked
to identify their needs not met by those services.
CapTech compared the client’s methodology and processes
to best practices and compared the results to the Gartner PPM Maturity Model
and the P3M3. CapTech then scored the
PMO’s current state and identified future state requirements from the analysis,
surveys, interviews and focus groups.
Lastly, CapTech conducted a gap analysis between the current state and
the future state requirements. The
output of this analysis allowed CapTech to
develop a detailed plan to implement the future state requirements that
addressed resource constraints, dependencies, and organizational feasibility.
Tools:
Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)
version 4
Gartner PPM Maturity Model
Office of Government Commerce's Portfolio,
Program, and Project Management Maturity Model (P3M3)
Results:
Provided
a framework for monitoring PMO progress and success
Clarified
customer expectations through future state requirements
Improved
relations between the PMO and its customers
Identified
the gaps between PMO services and customer needs
Detailed
the execution steps to close the gap between services and needs